regarding abels...i did some work for a guy once who paid me in abel reels (4 of 'em). though my wife thought that was pretty lame, i couldn't have been more pleased!!
photo by Bulldog1935 |
![]() |
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
tonemike |
|||
|
i love medalists, the orvis madison (medalist knock-offs) and the old system 1 reels as well. i did just get a sweet little lamson LP 1.5 lite from bill
archuleta (what a great guy) for only 75 bucks. IMO it'll be hard to find a better reel for a little 2-4wt. i even like the clicker better than those on my
abel creeks.
regarding abels...i did some work for a guy once who paid me in abel reels (4 of 'em). though my wife thought that was pretty lame, i couldn't have been more pleased!! |
|||
Cameron |
|||
tonemike wrote:That is pretty damn funny. |
|||
corlay |
|||
Cameron wrote:I've always been envious of the Guys in the forum, whose Wives also flyfish. That would make things a heck of a lot easier! Imagine it: No "looks" when the tube shows up on your doorstep!
"From my observations I think that most of us spend too much time worrying about our tackle and too little time
learning the intimate characteristics of the fish and streams we fish most."
- Ray Bergman
Trout, New York: Knopf 1938 |
|||
bulldog1935 |
|||
|
the best reel for under $50 is always going to be the most under-priced reel you can get your hands on.
That doesn't make it the correct answer to this question.
the rods are never obsolete - the marketing is.
|
|||
cofisher |
|||
|
Corey, don't believe for a minute that my wife doesn't give me "the look" when new packages arrive, sometimes several a week. My wife fishes,
she doesn't collect.
|
|||
rvreclus |
|||
|
Ah, Bulldog,
Getting philosophic are we? Of course there can be no right answer only the acceptable one. You have stated it quite simply the best buy under $50 for the most reel. Respectfully rvreclus |
|||
tobewan77 |
|||
|
Should we add: Best Reel for Under MSRP $50??? I think that's the honest spirit of the original post.
|
|||
corlay |
|||
tobewan77 wrote:does that mean that Bulldog's restored pre-war Youngs qualify? <g>
"From my observations I think that most of us spend too much time worrying about our tackle and too little time
learning the intimate characteristics of the fish and streams we fish most."
- Ray Bergman
Trout, New York: Knopf 1938 |
|||
bulldog1935 |
|||
|
I tried to answer it as what reel can you routinely buy for under $50 here, on ebay, or still in production.
If I listed my three best under $50 reel buys, they would all be reels that are actually worth over $150.
the rods are never obsolete - the marketing is.
|
|||
tobewan77 |
|||
|
pre-war prices? Well let's adjust that pre-war catalog price into today's dollars... I don't have the figures handy but i doubt it would qualify.
BDogs post above is a good measure to use, but is it really that vague of a question?
|
|||
Guadalupe Bass |
|||
|
Routinely buy at less than $50 ?
I'd agree with the Martin 67A and the Browning Strata MZ34. I have 2 of each because they're good and cheap, like me (cheap, that is). I'd throw the Martin MG-3 into the race as well. Harder to come across, but you can often pick one up if it stays under the radar. Tiny reel with a monstrously loud drag. |
|||
shakeylee.clarksclassicfl... |
|||
|
I bought the 4/5 for $30 (at my girlfriends' insistence) to complete my collection. But normally I get them for about $10 a piece. Eagle Claw reels get a
bad rap because they are the lesser of the Daiwa, Heddon etc. Hardy lightweight copies. However this medallion series, similar in ways to a Hardy Marquis
although with different drag, seem to be very fine reels to me. They are my favorite.
(i may have gotten the hardy model names wrong because in real life i've never even touched a hardy)
|
|||
bulldog1935 |
|||
|
those Eagle Claws are Shakespeares - they're very good reels.
the rods are never obsolete - the marketing is.
|
|||
flyfishing4goldentrout |
|||
|
Every year I put together little outfits for the BoyScouts and some of the seniors up here. Most any of the click and pawl reels, simple and in new or near new
shape qualify, Mostly american made Martins, Shakespeares and a few others. Nothing fancy, mostly under $30 including the shipping. I put em on equally low
cost rods and outfit the scouts with outfits in the 5-6wt glass, they have a ball on the lake frontage for panfish, bass and a few trout. The Seniors get some
nice 6-7wts, mostly 7wts, same panfish on the lake but more directed for some of our abundent population of LMB.
I like to remember the spool is for containing and respooling the line, its up to the fisherman to creat the proper resistance to the running fish. I love fishing the panfish here and the winter trout with my graphite ultra lights, my primary reels are Martin 61s on some of the highest end UL rods you can buy, why the lack of drag to snap my 1# and 2# tippets. As Lee Wulff said, the reel is for line storage, weither its on the rod or in your pocket. I know we all have fancy reels, I do too, but when I drag out the Orvis 1wt its with a Martin 61 Most of our best reels admit it, are eye candy, mens jewelry, I will. We like em so we have em. Between the eye candy and the plain jane reels are a multitude of good low cost reels. I love the import Hardy clones, I love them on 5-7wt rods, very cost efficent, but its not because of any other reason than I can control their drag settings to near nothing and depend on their construction. Some are very very well made and many have palming spools. Just my thoughts, Richard |
|||
Frank Longcast |
|||
|
I didn't buy it new but I imagine it was close to $50.00 or under when new. The LL Bean Streamlight 4/5. It is a nice little reversible click/pawl with a
deep anodized finish. Here it is with a couple of other green reels.
I'm just longing for Spring.
Last Edited By: Frank Longcast
02/22/09 11:16:47.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
rvreclus |
|||
|
Bulldog,
I have a reel just like Longcasts' LL Bean and Shakeylees' Shakespeares/Eagle Claws, but it's labeled an Aurora "Elite" . It is a great little reel with a functional drag. Who is the original manufactuer? I think mine is Japanese, bought in the early 90's for $45. Respectfully rvreclus |
|||
flysupplies |
|||
|
Aurora made in Korea. Disc Drag version is similar to the Orvis Battenkill.
Click Pawl version was close to a Hardy Marquis.
I might still have an extra spare spool for it if you need one. Bob |
|||
bulldog1935 |
|||
|
http://www.codella.com/usedreel.htm
OK, I'm floored - Codella has a black Redington CT 3/4 for $45 - somebody should snag this, because it's a much better reel than this price...
the rods are never obsolete - the marketing is.
|
|||
journeyman.clarksclassicfl... |
|||
|
Does anyone have any opinions on the new Madalists? I have not tried one but was interested in getting one of the 1494's. I have heard people write them
off and say they are no good. Part of that could just be because they are made in China. Anyone have one?
Roy |
|||
corlay |
|||
journeyman wrote:A new 1492 & 1494 are the first reels I used, when I got back into the sport ~4yrs. ago. It works very well. I do not have USA models to compare it to, however. I do have an AK 1495. But that may not be of much help. It's a nice reel, but the new version is probably right on par. I think it's the "Made in USA" cache that most seek in these reels. I don't think the construction or components have changed all that much, since they were first introduced, way back when....
"From my observations I think that most of us spend too much time worrying about our tackle and too little time
learning the intimate characteristics of the fish and streams we fish most."
- Ray Bergman
Trout, New York: Knopf 1938 |
|||