<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Intermediate Fly Lines </title>
        <link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/topic/9565/t/Intermediate-Fly-Lines.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I just wanted to get some opinions on line here.  I&#39;ve been flyfishing probably for about 15+ years and have never once used/purchased anything but a
floating line.  I fish small mountain streams and sometimes up to medium size streams.  I fish 99.9% nymphs and I&#39;ve found that a floating line does quite
well with nymphing even in relatively deep water as long as enough split shot is used when necessary and keep a short line.  Does anybody find any benefit to
an intermediate line in... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:56:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:04:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Intermediate Fly Lines  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/reply/71988/t/Intermediate-Fly-Lines.html#reply-71988</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I love intermediate lines, especially a 6 and 8 weight. They cut thru wind like a bullet and you can get a lot of distance with them. I fish one quite a bit
here in salt water because the wind is almost always blowing and they don&#39;t blow around on the surface like a floating line. I always have one in my
fishing bag. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (wb4tjh)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/sreply/71988</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:04:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Intermediate Fly Lines  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/reply/71943/t/Intermediate-Fly-Lines.html#reply-71943</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Use intermediate and sink/tip lines so you can get rid of the split shot and be fly-fishing again. I use them sometime along the way in almost any long day of
fishing on rivers or streams. Depending on brand, all sink gradually, some slightly faster than others. One advantage is their versatility when prospecting.
They sink slow enough to give a good float with a dry, fast enough to get a nymph, streamer, or wet fly down just a bit. You augment this capability by the
position of the cast and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (whrlpool)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/sreply/71943</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Intermediate Fly Lines  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/reply/71942/t/Intermediate-Fly-Lines.html#reply-71942</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ In almost all stream situations, an intermediate is likely to be a disadvantage, not an advantage. On the drift you won&#39;t gain much depth with it and on
the swing it will come almost to the surface. A big disadvantage is in mending where an intermediate doesn&#39;t work well once it begins to sink. Also
pickups, except at shorter distances are mure difficult. Where an intermediate shines is in lakes and the best ones are the clear type that are great with
spooky fish. If you want to... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (16 pmd)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/sreply/71942</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Intermediate Fly Lines  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/reply/71939/t/Intermediate-Fly-Lines.html#reply-71939</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I use 7wt and 8wt Intermediate lines a lot, like has been said, mostly in still water, but also in some of the big rivers I fish, when swinging buggers and the
like. Intermediate line gets under all that commotion at the top, and seems to maintain a straight line connection tween me and the fly better than a floating
ling.
<br>
Love Orvis burnt orange Int line, pretty inexpensive too.
<br>
For small cricks I don&#39;t think you would see any advantage, but the fun of this game is getting new... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (majicwrench)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/sreply/71939</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:40:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Intermediate Fly Lines  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/reply/71934/t/Intermediate-Fly-Lines.html#reply-71934</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This Spring,
<br>
I spliced a 8&#39;6&quot; length of tip taper taken from a WF6I intermediate line onto a H+H DTF6 line,
<br>
after I removed the same length from the tip taper of that line.
<br>
<br>
I wanted to see if it gave me any advantage fishing wet flies in trout streams,
<br>
mostly for situations where a fast run terminates into a deep pool;
<br>
hoping it would get my flies down a little better.
<br>
<br>
I feel that it did work,
<br>
and may have resulted in a few more trout.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (corlay)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/sreply/71934</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:11:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Intermediate Fly Lines  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/reply/71933/t/Intermediate-Fly-Lines.html#reply-71933</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Intermediate lines are great for <span style="font-weight: bold;">stillwater</span>. I use intermediate when fishing lakes and reservoirs. Close in to
shoreline with weed structure. Never gave intermediate a thought for streams. Not a fast enough sink rate. Moving water, you might want to think about a sink
tip. Teeney comes to mind. I think Bulldog fishes a lot of Teeny lines along with others on the board. Maybe they&#39;ll chime in.
<br>
 
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Mojorizing)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/sreply/71933</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Intermediate Fly Lines  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/reply/71931/t/Intermediate-Fly-Lines.html#reply-71931</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;d not bother with a sinking line of any type if you are already able to reach the depths you seek with your present setup. If I recall correctly, the
Intermediate lines are of most use in larger bodies of non-flowing water, where their slow sinking rates allow the line to be just underneath the wind and
waves and therefore not moved around a lot. If you want to reach greater depths than you do at present, faster sink rate lines or sink tip lines would be of
more use to you than an... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Golfswithwolves)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/sreply/71931</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:11:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Intermediate Fly Lines  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/topic/9565/t/Intermediate-Fly-Lines.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I just wanted to get some opinions on line here.  I&#39;ve been flyfishing probably for about 15+ years and have never once used/purchased anything but a
floating line.  I fish small mountain streams and sometimes up to medium size streams.  I fish 99.9% nymphs and I&#39;ve found that a floating line does quite
well with nymphing even in relatively deep water as long as enough split shot is used when necessary and keep a short line.  Does anybody find any benefit to
an intermediate line in... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jrb78)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.yuku.com/topic/9565</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:56:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>